GaN vs Traditional Chargers in 2025: Why Size Matters for Modern Charging
GaN (Gallium Nitride) chargers have become the industry standard in 2025. But what makes them different from traditional silicon chargers, and are they worth it in 2026?
TL;DR
Quick jumps: Size comparison | Cost question | How to choose | Bottom line
What Is GaN Technology?
GaN (Gallium Nitride) is a semiconductor material that has replaced silicon as the standard in power electronics. The same technology powers LED lights, 5G infrastructure, and electric vehicle systems.
For chargers, GaN's key advantage is higher efficiency in a smaller package. But to understand why, we need to briefly discuss how chargers work.
How Chargers Convert Power
Your wall outlet provides AC (alternating current) power, but your devices need DC (direct current). A charger's job is to convert AC to DC at the right voltage and amperage.
This conversion process isn't 100% efficient—some energy becomes heat. The more heat generated, the larger the heat sinks and enclosure needed.
Traditional silicon chargers operate at roughly 85-88% efficiency. A 65W charger might waste 8-10W as heat.
Third-generation GaN chargers achieve 94-95% efficiency. That same 65W output wastes only 3-4W as heat.
Less heat means smaller heat sinks, which means dramatically smaller chargers.
Size Comparison: Real Numbers
Here's how GaN actually translates to size differences in 2025:
| Power Output | Silicon Charger | GaN Charger | Size Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30W | ~45cm³ | ~22cm³ | 51% smaller |
| 65W | ~95cm³ | ~45cm³ | 53% smaller |
| 100W | ~180cm³ | ~75cm³ | 58% smaller |
| 140W | ~250cm³ | ~100cm³ | 60% smaller |
Practical example: Apple's original 61W MacBook Pro charger is 180cm³. A GaN 65W charger from UGREEN (with similar output) is 50cm³—less than a third of the size.
Beyond Size: Other GaN Advantages
Better Heat Management
GaN chargers run cooler under load. This extends component lifespan and improves safety. Some silicon chargers get uncomfortably hot during sustained use; quality GaN chargers stay warm but never hot.
Higher Power Density
The same physical space can deliver more power with GaN. This enables:
Future-Proofing
USB PD standards keep increasing (100W, 140W, 240W). GaN technology scales better to these higher power levels. Buying GaN now means your charger can potentially support future devices.
The Cost Question in 2025&2026
GaN chargers have become much more affordable in 2025, with only a 10-20% premium over silicon chargers in most cases. Is the premium worth it?
For travel: Absolutely. The size and weight savings are substantial. A GaN charger that fits in your jacket pocket versus a silicon brick in your bag is a real quality-of-life improvement.
For desk use: Still worth considering. The cooler operation means safer charging and longer lifespan. Plus, prices have dropped significantly.
For high-power needs (100W+): Essential. At these power levels, silicon chargers become impractically large. GaN is mandatory.
GaN Generations Explained
GaN charger technology has evolved through several generations:
First Generation (2018-2019): Basic GaN transistors. 20-30% smaller than silicon equivalents.
Second Generation (2020-2021): Improved GaN-on-Silicon designs. 40-50% size reduction, better efficiency.
Third Generation (2022-2024): GaN fast-switching designs with integrated drivers. Up to 60% size reduction, 94%+ efficiency.
Fourth Generation (2025): Enhanced thermal management and smart power distribution. 95%+ efficiency, AI-powered charging optimization in premium models.
What to buy: Current (2026) GaN chargers are all third or fourth-generation. Don't worry about "GaN II" or "GaN III" marketing—just check the charger's size, efficiency, and specs.
Common GaN Misconceptions
Misconception: GaN chargers are fragile
False. GaN chips are more robust than silicon against heat and electrical stress. Early GaN chargers had quality control issues, but current products are very reliable.
Misconception: GaN charges faster than silicon
Partially true. GaN and silicon chargers with the same wattage rating charge at the same speed. But GaN enables higher-wattage chargers in portable form factors, so you can carry more charging power.
Misconception: All GaN chargers are premium quality
False. GaN is the chip technology; build quality depends on the manufacturer. Cheap GaN chargers can still have poor capacitors, weak cables, or inadequate safety circuits.
How to Choose a GaN Charger in 2026
Check Actual Specifications
Marketing often emphasizes "GaN technology" while hiding weak specs. Look for:
Consider Your Use Case
Minimalist travel: Single-port 30-45W GaN. Smallest possible size.
Laptop + phone travel: Dual-port 65W GaN. Best overall value for most users.
Desktop replacement: Multi-port 100W+ GaN. Powers everything from one outlet.
MacBook Pro 16" / gaming laptop: 140W+ GaN with USB PD 3.1. Only option for full-speed charging.
Trusted GaN Charger Brands in 2025
Based on build quality, safety testing, and customer support:
My GaN Charger Recommendations for 2026
Best Everyday Charger
UGREEN Nexode 100W 4-Port
Four ports, compact design, powers any laptop. Excellent smart power distribution for simultaneous device charging.
Best Travel Charger
Anker Nano Pro 40W
Single USB-C port, barely larger than a pack of gum. Perfect for MacBook Air and phone charging.
Best Value
UGREEN Nexode 65W 2-Port GaN
USB-C + USB-C with proper 65W single-port output. Excellent build quality at a competitive price.
Best High-Power Option
UGREEN Nexode 140W or Anker Prime 140W
Full USB PD 3.1 support for MacBook Pro 16" and high-powered Windows laptops. Multiple ports with intelligent power distribution.
The Bottom Line
GaN technology is the new standard, not a premium upgrade. For any charger purchase in 2025, GaN should be your default choice. The technology has matured, prices have dropped to near-silicon levels, and there's no good reason to buy bulky silicon chargers anymore.
The size reduction is worth it for travel. The cooler operation is worth it for desk use. The higher efficiency is worth it for the environment. GaN wins on every metric.
One caveat: GaN doesn't fix a bad charger design. A quality silicon charger is better than a cheap GaN charger. Focus on overall product quality, not just the chip technology.
Data Sources: Manufacturer specifications, published efficiency benchmarks, and USB-IF documentation. Last verified: 2026-01-08.
Disclosure: This article may contain affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support our research. Learn more